Sunday, 26 April 2009

My Final Report: Durban II the Overview

Durban II overall review

I arrived in Geneva on Sunday lunchtime, I knew very little about what my purpose was at the conference or even what the conference would be about, apart from being told about the disgusting behaviour of many NGO’s at the 2001 Conference against Racism.

When we arrived we met up with our fellow delegates from across the world, many students from Britain, Holland, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Poland, Italy, Spain, Australia, South Africa, Israel, Canada and only a few surprisingly from the USA. We had several sessions with key political figures explaining to us the structure of the conference, the outcome document and ultimately what we were in Geneva to do.

In 2001 the conference in Durban became known as the ‘hatefest’, outside the UN and within it NGO’s and activists were shouting antisemetic slogans, accusing the Jews of some almighty conspriracy and intimidating anyone Jewish at the conference. I would like to point out that I have always been one of these people who is wary of the equation that anti-zionism is anti-semitism, i have generally always rejected that idea and I will continue to reject it as a student in Leeds, however the people who were campaigning on behalf of the Palestinians in 2001 were not using language that could created a blur between anti-zionism and anti-semitism, these people were using out and out anti-semetic language.

So clearly, we were expecting much of the same in Geneva, we were pleasantly surprised, we were not greeted by placards accusing us of wild conspiracies, we arrived and the city seemed a little dull. On Monday morning we started, the conference kicked off and we were listening and observing the conference with great interest, and I might add with great anxiety. Of course we were all waiting for the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s address to the UN and waiting to see how the remaining western European countries dealt with this tyrant. I wish I could write that I did not expect to hear those words come out of Ahmadinejad’s mouth, however the entire UN knew exactly what was coming, even after being told to tone down his words by UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, he still managed to come out with some vile notions, he accused the Zionist of starting the war in Iraq, questioned the holocaust, and numerous times accused the Zionists of taking advantage of the so called holocaust.

This conference was a farce to begin with. As a Jewish student attending the conference, it was rife with antisemitism, I was personally accused by a member of another NGO of having an intrinsic born desire to control the world, was subsequently blamed for the slave trade and accused of wanting to murder the Palestinians, she later told me that every single non-Jew in the world hates the Jews and more specifically that 56% of the conference hated the Jews, so clearly the remaining 44% must have been Jewish....
On the friday a Canadian NGO stood up and denied that Antisemitism even existed and accused Israel and the 'Zionist Lobby' of creating the myth of antisemitism to fuel the zionist expansion, they later declared to the main plenary that 9/11 did not happen and it is a conspiracy, I will let you try to guess who they blamed.

Israel has its flaws, it has racists, as does every country, however there is no way that it can be labelled racist, Gaza cannot be described as a genocide and this is all propaganda fuelled by Iran (Who sent a small number of NGO's to spread a message of hate). And just to add, I have been criticised in the last few days for not mentioning the Palestinians in my articles, the Palestinians are suffering, suffering greatly from poor leadership both in Israel and within the occupied territories, however this conference was never meant to be about Israel/Palestine, it was meant to be about human rights, I am focusing on Israel in my articles because at this conference criticism of Israel jumped to a new level I have never witnessed before, all of my perhaps more innocent left leaning principles were smashed by peoples and NGO’s blatant anti-semitism that I witnessed be excused because they mention the word Zionist at various points in a sentence as well as the word Jew.

Language is everything, the language that people use today about Israel has origins from the 2001 conference, the 2001 conference as stated in the numerous times has been discredited as a 'hatefest', this hatefest produced language that is deeply offensive to Jews.
Just because this sort of offensive language is used in the United Nations, a supposedly respectable international body, it does not mean it is right. The language used by NGO's, Iran, Sudan and ultimately the Iranian president are still vile and beyond comprehension. As a Jewish student in Leeds, I am subjected to this language about Israel on a daily basis, the people who use this language I do not deem to be anti-semetic, however the origins of the language, being the Durban 1 conference is most definitely rooted in pure out and out anti-semitism.
The NGO's present at this conference were not the SWP, Respect or other vocal anti-Israel campaigners on campus, they were disgusting and despicable organisations whose only concern are to be racist and to abuse the platform given to them by our almighty United Nations. Somehow the supposed self proclaimed bastions of anti-racism being the SWP, Respect and other far left political groups have adopted this language and declared it as acceptable when criticising Israel, I would advise any vocal critic of Israel to look deeply at where their language originates from, my suspicion is that terms like apartheid, concentration camp in Gaza and other terms have their origins from some of the NGO's that attended the 2001 conference. Let me make it perfectly clear, many, if not most of the NGO's I encountered had some link to extremism, terrorism or the Iranian government. The respected ones like Amnesty were not visible at this conference...I wonder why.

This was the first time I had ever visited Geneva or the United Nations, I also suspect this will be the last as what I experienced I truly struggle to put into words.
Jewish students were victimised by the UN itself for exposing the joke that the conference was, there were two separately accredited Jewish student organisations, the French Union of Jewish students were responsible for the protest with Clown wigs and red noses during the Iranian president's speech, my organisation I was accredited with, the European Union of Jewish Students had nothing what so ever to do with this protest, however the UN subsequently attempted to ban all Jewish students from entering the United Nations complex in Geneva on numerous occasions. The UN held several press conference's specifically about 'Jewish students disrupting' the conference, this was purely a way to deflect attention away from the circus that the conference became.

We have all heard about the major western powers boycotting the event, however what you have not heard about is the real embarrassment to the UN. Organisations like Amnesty International and the International Red Cross chose not to attend in force with large delegations, they were embarrassed to publically be part of such a farce, this is what struck me most, a vocal critic of Israel choosing not to attend an Anti-Racism conference aimed at promoting Human rights, why did they not come? Pure embarrassment at being part of such an event. (Just to point out the International headquarters of the Red Cross is across the road from the UN complex and no high level Red Cross delegates were visibly present.)

Lastly, on Friday several NGO's which are hard line to say the least, and almost definitely sponsored in some manner by the Iranian government were due to hold side fringe meetings for NGO delegates, for an unknown reason I understand that the UN revoked all press passes to NGO meetings that day, they refused to give journalists a reason why. The UN was clearly embarrassed by the content of what was being aired within their own four walls, they have been giving a platform all week to racists, bigots and terrorist supporting organisations.

Ultimately the loser at this conference was Human Rights, I proudly attended a 200 strong rally for Darfur outside the Palais DeNations, we had hundreds of cars, including diplomatic cars honking their horns in support of our cause, however the United Nations is simply a talk shop where real human rights issues are ignored and great nations like Britain pay lip service to some of the worst human rights abusers in the world, like China,

Darfur was ignored.

What happened to the profound saying...
NEVER AGAIN

Thursday, 23 April 2009

Disgrace!

So today is my last day here at the Durban Review Conference. L'Hebdo (Swiss Newspaper) have described our work here at this conference 'the revenge of the Jewish people' for the disgrace of the Durban 1 Conference in 2001.
This conference is not a victory, this conference is a disgrace. Growing up and being a politics student i have always had a rosy view of the UN, the peace keepers of the world, the people who care for everyone in the world. What i have witnessed is quite the opposite. I have witnessed the UN host and give a platform to a Clown, i have witnessed a small number of states actually condemning what he said, i have witnessed Iran be allowed the last speech of the day yesterday so that they could officially respond to the European countries walking out of the Plenary room as a statement that we will not allow Iran, and what a surprise... Iran used this opportunity to criticize Israel.
The UN have been releasing statements condemning the Jewish student groups, an example is this one from Rupert Colville.

"Two particular NGOs (non-governmental organizations)" have been disruptive, said Colville, noting the Union of Jewish Student in France and the European Union of Jewish Students.

The United Nations would prefer to give a platform to a holocaust denying, homophobic, sexist, and ultimately racist man rather than Jewish students whose most 'violent' protest at the conference has been wearing a clown wig and throwing a red nose at the Iranian president. I applaud the French Union of Jewih Student for doing this, i must admit that the EUJS were not part of this protest. As i speak right now the UN are holding a press conference on the actions of the Jewish students, it is a disgrace. Keep following, another update coming in afew hours.

Tuesday, 21 April 2009

CALL ON THE UK GOVERNMENT TO WITHDRAW

The controversy over Ahmadnejad speaking at the UN Durban Review Conference is now all over the news worldwide. The protest from the conference floor of several delegations walking out was nothing short of admirable and a true reflection of what the conference should be representative of.The speech that the Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gave yesterday was appalling. It crossed all of the UK red lines as well as many other countries, and we are proud that the UK delegation were among the first to walk out as he began to speak. As the day and the evening progressed, other countries began to pull out of the conference altogether as further protest of the farce that has become the Durban Review Conference.We now have a responsibility to hold our British delegation accountable for continuing their participation in a conference that is clearly here not to stand up against racism and intolerance worldwide, but bear witness to it happening on its own doorstep and do nothing. Furthermore they continue to be part of a conference with a chairperson and many other delegations that remained silent during the tirade of a racist.We call as students in Geneva witnessing this injustice and the disgrace that the conference has descended in to for the British government to withdraw their delegation from the Durban Review Conference.

Monday, 20 April 2009

Foreign Minister for Norway responds to Iran

Foreign minister for Norway responds to Iran

By Dani Orelowitz, University of Nottingham
Foreign Minister of Norway
- Freedom of speech is an integral part of human rights. However there is a need to protect against incitement to hatred and the promotion of intolerances.

- We are not here to fingerpoint or to list conflicts..- We have to protect people against racism, discrimination and incitement to hate.

- The speech of the Iranian president runs counter to the spirit and dignity of this conference.

- He made Iran the odd man out and Norway won't accept this conference to be hijacked by the odd man out.

- There is an agreed text that is within the red lines as defined by Norway. A few months ago it included conflicting messages. Norway did not accept a text that was hijacked and refuses to have a text which recreated history: The Holocaust wasa man-made disaster.

- "We will not surrender the floor of the United Nations to extremism."

Basic Points of President Ahmadinejad's Speech

By Judith Flack, University of Sussex

- "Over the last centuries, humanity has gone through tremendous sufferings and pains...

- The UN Security Council is one of the legacies of world war two and world war one. What was the logic behind them granting themselves the veto rights?...

- The council is the highest decision making world body for safe guarding international peace and security. How can we expect the realization of peace and justice when discrimination is legalized by force, coercion and arrogance, rather than justice?...

- Today many proponents of racism condemn racial discrimination in their slogans. A number of countries have been authorized to decide for other nations based on their own interest and on their discretions. They can ridicule humanitarian values...

- An entire nation was made homeless under pretext of Jewish suffering and established a racist government. The most cruel and repressive racist regime in Palestine...

- The Security Council support given for past sixty years has given free reign to the racist perpetrators of genocide whilst the free minded people of the world condemn oppression and bombardment of the people of Gaza...

- Almost 1 million people were killed during the creation of Israel...


- Today the West is injecting hundreds of billions of cash from the pockets of their own people into the failing banks companies and financial institutions making the situation more and more complicated for their economy and their people. They are simply thinking about maintaining power and wealth. They couldn’t care any less about the people of the world and their own people...


- The Media render support to the Zionist regime… Efforts must be made to put an end to the abuse by Zionists and their supporters of political and international means. Governments must be encouraged and supported in their plights to eradicate this barbarical racism and to move towards reform in the current international mechanisms..


- Zionist conspiracy: There have been literature and statements in support of Zionists and their crimes and it is the responsibility of honorable representatives of nations to disclose these campaigns…



- This session is a true indication of supporting the blatant example of racism. In defending human rights it is primarily important to defend the rights of all nations to participate equally in all decision making processes without the influence of certain powers. Therefore this conference is a testing ground and the world public opinion today and tomorrow will judge our decisions and our actions...



- The world is going through fundamental changes. Cracks in the pillars of world oppression can now be removed. Major economical structures are at the brink of collapse. Political and security crisis are on the rise. The need to change this wrong direction to which the world is being managed today. And I have also warned of the dire consequences of any delay of this crucial responsibility. Now in this valuable event would like to announce here to all leaders, thinkers, and to all nations of the world, present in this meeting and those who have a hunger for peace, economic wellbeing that the unjust management is now at the end of the road. The imposed management was oppressive..."

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has just arrived

I just witnessed Mahmoud Ahmadinejad arrive at the UN Conference against racism, i even came within 10 ft of the man. He is due to give the main address of the afternoon, this man, a man who advocates holocaust denial, a man who has vowed the destruction of the state of Israel, a man who claims that Iran has no homosexuals, this man is giving the main address at a UN conference for Human Rights and against racism this afternoon.

At my university in Leeds, we have a diverse bunch of people, however the UN is a far more diverse institution, an institution that prides itself on being the global protector of human rights. At Leeds met, i am proud to say we would not allow such a man to speak, we would give all students in Leeds the respect and dignity to not have to attend a university that devalues the basic human rights and breeds hatred.

Many countries and NGO's have already vowed to walk out during his address in recognition of his abhorrent views, however i would urge anyone and everyone at this conference to avoid listening and giving a platform to this biggot.

This is probably not enough, this conference does not need more european states to pull out, as the conference is already a de-ligitimised body for giving such a platform to this man.

Keep watching for the next update at 4pm GMT

So Far...

Sorry for the late first update, i have been extremely busy and apoligise. A quick summary of the happenings so far in Geneva.

I arrived yesterday morning, after leaving Stanmore at 5am to get to Stansted airport. After arriving in Geneva and getting lost at least twice, we finally made it to our hostel and started planning with the rest of the global Jewish student taskforce. We were briefed on the happenings and what to expect in the next few days.

This conference has been blighted by the sheer lack of respect shown by the OIC and organisers of the conference towards the subject of Racism. I fully support the decision of many brave nations such as the USA, Italy, Holland, Canada, Australia to boycott this conference.

The organisers (Libya & Iran) and OIC are attempting to use this forum against racism for thier own purpose and protect their own governments against Human rights laws.

Actions such as stoning women for being accused of adultery, killing homosexuals, allowing girls as young as 9 to be prosecuted, discriminaton towards Jews, Bahai, Christians are just a small example of human rights abuses that Iran specifically has commited. AND IRAN ARE VICE CHAIR OF THIS CONFERENCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND AGAINST RACISM.

Friday, 17 April 2009

Wary of Iran, diplomats close in on UN racism deal

Agence France Presse, France
17 April 2009 14:59 GMT
Samuel Gardaz
Diplomats and campaigners said Friday that an agreement on a declaration for a UN anti-racism conference was taking shape, despite fears that the arrival of Iran's president could disrupt the meeting.

Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has stirred outrage by repeatedly calling the Holocaust a "myth" and with anti-Israel comments, is the only prominent head of state so far scheduled to attend the Durban Review Conference on Monday.

News of his attendance has sparked renewed fears that the five-day meeting, which begins in Geneva on Monday, could end in acrimony -- like the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa, eight years ago.

The United States and Israel walked out of the 2001 conference, amid charges it had become a forum for anti-Semitism.

A similar row has marred negotiations in recent months to draw up the final declaration at the Geneva meeting -- which is due to take stock of progress in fighting racism and xenophobia since Durban -- prompting boycott threats by some Western states.

But human rights groups and diplomats said Friday that Western and most Muslim states had agreed to iron out most of the controversial issues, relating to religious discrimination and Israel.

"It seems that governments are planning an agreement on two of the most important political battles that were at the centre of the negotiations," said Antoine Madelin of the International human rights federation (FIDH).

"There's only one point outstanding, the question of the Holocaust," a Western diplomat told AFP late Thursday, speaking on condition of anonymity.

A Iranian diplomat said Tehran wanted to transfer a standalone reference to the Holocaust into a section on injustices of the past, a demand that Europeans regard as unacceptable.

Given the Iranian president's previous hardline statements, a European diplomat said it could be more difficult to find a consensus if the talks spill over next week, calling the talks "a race against the clock."

But other diplomats said that while Ahmadinejad's attendance would divert public attention, he was unlikely to derail negotiations on a renewed international pledge to fight racism.

"In other UN meetings, some countries did not agree on everything but that does not prevent their heads of states from attending," said an Asian diplomat. "We should not prejudge the Iranian president's participation."

Any provocative statement made by Ahmadinejad may be used by boycotting delegations to justify their decision to stay away, the diplomat said.

Human Rights Watch, which had earlier urged governments not to let the scheduled presence of Ahmadinejad on Monday undermine the upcoming conference, played down the Iranian impact on Friday.

"There is a broad consensus of nations coming forward for this review conference," said Julie de Rivero, advocacy director for the rights group in Geneva.

"There may be isolated attempts to change things, but they remain that and I don't think they will have an influence," she told journalists.

Gerald Steinberg, executive director of pro-Israel lobby group NGO Monitor, also believed the Iranian president was unlikely to threaten the conference's outcome.

But he noted: "If Ahmadinejad is here, it will turn the whole thing into a circus."

European Union states would decide late Friday if they would take part, French Secretary of State Rama Yade said in Paris.

The United States has said it would not re-engage in the anti-racism conference unless what it considers restrictions on freedom of expression were lifted.

Theater of the absurd

Analysis: A theater of the absurd
Apr. 17, 2009
Gerald M. Steinberg , THE JERUSALEM POST

Two large tents have been set up inside the United Nations compound in Geneva to handle the large crowds expected to line up for passes for the Durban Review Conference, opening on Monday. In addition to diplomats, there will be hundreds of officials from non-governmental organizations that claim to promote human rights, and a large media presence - certainly much larger than most events here usually warrant.

Apart from the tents, very little else at the event - which is taking place in the grand buildings constructed for the failed League of Nations between the two world wars - is ready.

The original UN World Conference Against Racism, held in Durban, South Africa in 2001, was prepared in Teheran under the radar of the governments of the United States and Israel, and when it suddenly turned into a virulent propaganda event, there was little that could be done.

The declaration of the government session was toned down, but still singled out Israel and all but ignored the real issues of racial discrimination around the world. In parallel, the NGO Forum did the heavy lifting of demonizing Israel, using terms like "apartheid" and "war crimes," and adopting a strategy of boycotts and isolation.

In contrast, for this Review Conference, every move has been examined under the spotlight of public debate, and the efforts led by Iran and Libya to repeat and expand on their successes in 2001 were quickly exposed. Instead of waiting for the last minute, first Canada, and then Israel, the United States and Italy announced that they would not participate in a similar betrayal of the moral foundations of human rights. Other European officials have made similar-sounding statements, while waiting to see if the text and surrounding events could be made palatable.

This threw the entire planning process into a state of chaos: With three days to go before the opening, the UN still does not know who is attending and who will be staying away. The vague statements and rumors change hourly - sometimes it is Germany that is reportedly out, other times Holland, Britain or the Czech Republic, or perhaps all 27 members of the European Union (this one seems unlikely).

And, in part as a result, there is no agreed draft text to be discussed, or perhaps more correctly, there are several versions. It seems that every day, a UN official announces that the final - really final this time - consensus text is about to be unveiled, resolving all of the disputes, and reestablishing the legitimacy of this event.

On Wednesday, UN Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay made a plea for help in preventing the disintegration of this conference, arguing that "lives are at stake. The future and hope of countless victims of racism lie in your hands."

Indeed, there are real victims of discrimination, even in the heart of Europe, but the anti-Israel obsession, to which even "respected" NGOs like Amnesty and Human Rights Watch contribute, has all but erased these moral issues. Pillay's plea also came far too late. She, like her predecessor Mary Robinson in 2001, was guilty of silence as the racists - led by Libya and Iran - were allowed to dominate the anti-racism agenda.

And then, to top off the absurdity, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced that he would be attending. Ahmadinejad is the personification of everything the anti-racism conference was designed to address - he is a Holocaust denier who has called for genocide against Israel. Under his regime, Iran has become one of the major violators of human rights, oppressing women, minorities, religious groups like the Bahais and the small Jewish community, which live in constant fear of sudden arrests for "espionage."

When the news of the Iranian leader's decision reached the UN officials in Geneva, you could see and hear the combination of laughter and embarrassment. They recognized that there was no greater symbol of the hypocrisy represented by the Durban process - not even the radical NGOs which are planning to carry placards declaring "Zionism is racism" and similar slogans through the streets of Geneva, in a pale imitation of their moment of glory in Durban.

What is left of the Durban Review Conference is a circus, symbolized by the white tents. Whatever happens now is unlikely to change the overall conclusion that the Durban process which began in 2001 - based on demonizing Israel through the abuse of moral-sounding rhetoric - has now been exposed, ridiculed and perhaps defeated. If this is indeed the result, it will be a long time before the United Nations agrees to another such circus.

Prof Gerald M. Steinberg is Executive Director of NGO Monitor and heads the Political Studies Department at Bar Ilan University.

Thursday, 16 April 2009

The Durban II Snow Job: One giant leap backwards for humankind

A version of this article appears in The New York Daily News, Thursday, April 16, 2009.

The UN’s idea of an anti-racism conference entered the final stretch today with the planning committee deciding Iran ought to preside as a Vice-Chair, Libya will serve as the Chair of the “Main Committee” running the conference and Cuba will be the Rapporteur. All three human rights paragons will assume their new duties on the first day of “Durban II” set for Monday, April 20th.

Although the flowers are blooming by Lake Geneva, these Durban II preparations are best described as a massive snow job. The UN had set aside three days this week to hammer out a final document to be adopted formally at the conference itself. But Libyan Chair Najat Al-Hajjaji adjourned the meeting half an hour after it began – despite the fact that half of the 142-paragraph draft manifesto has not yet been agreed.

Al-Hajjaji is serving as the front for the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) . Her not-so-hidden agenda is shared by the Secretary-General of Durban II, UN High Commissioner Navi Pillay. For Pillay, a native of Durban, South Africa, the Durban Declaration’s stature is of biblical proportion. Sitting at the podium side-by-side, Al-Hajjaji and Pillay’s strategy became painfully obvious to the hundreds of assembled diplomats and NGO representatives who thought they had came to talk about combating racism.

Their maneuver had two main elements. First, run out the clock. By adjourning rapidly, and probably for most of the next two days, the conference will be bound to start on Monday with the European Union at the table and the threat of a democratic pull-out gone. All UN diplomats are well aware of the fact that the EU will agree to just about anything when faced with the spectacle of a “failed” UN conference. EU members don’t have the numbers to prevail at the UN if a vote is called and therefore feign consensus instead of appearing to be “losers” to the folks back home. They are also fond of the UN as a means to outweigh the United States 27-1. And EU states wilt at the prospect of being labeled former colonial racists (by racists from the developing world.)

The second Al-Hajjaji-Pillay/OIC-UN move is to keep all disagreements behind closed doors as long as possible. This way, the damage done to combating racism in the backroom negotiations will be in the form of indecipherable ambiguous UN-eze by the time it is a done deal.

When Al-Hajjaji clocked out 30 minutes after showing up for work, she asked delegates to pick up a new draft of the “Durban II Outcome Document” on their way out the door. Little wonder she wanted no opportunity for public discussion. Here is what can be found in the latest draft of the UN’s new “anti-racism” bible:


Condemnation of “foreign occupation” – aka Israel-bashing. Foreign occupation is said to be “closely associated with racism, racial discrimination…and contribute to the persistence of racist attitudes and practices…” In other words, labeling the Jewish nation as the world’s racist state is back.
"Defamation of religions" returns under a new guise. The document professes “deep concern” about “the negative stereotyping of religions.”
More of the Islamic assault on free speech. The draft “reaffirms that all dissemination of ideas based on…incitement to racial discrimination…shall be declared offences punishable by law…”
More Iranian-driven references to “cultural diversity” – the diplomatic cover for the murder of homosexuals, judicially-sanctioned amputation of hands and feet, and the stoning of woman for alleged adultery.
Renewed emphasis on the “transatlantic slave trade” and total rejection of a proposed mention of the trans-Saharan slave trade perpetrated by Arabs and other Africans.
Additional emphasis on the adoption of “complementary standards” on racism and xenophobia – an Islamic idea designed to subvert the universal principles in existing treaties.

And lest anyone be under the impression that Durban II will go away come April 25th, the draft demands that the Durban Declaration be implemented or “mainstreamed” “in the whole UN system” forevermore.

Silencing public commentary on the abomination was not the only thing the OIC-UN nexus accomplished in the space of thirty minutes. Also quickly gaveled without comment was approval of 81 NGOs to participate in Durban II. Included among these illustrious “human rights” partners:


The Independent Jewish Voices – a network composed largely of anti-Zionists preoccupied with driving a wedge between Jews and Israel.
The Palestine Return Center which objects to the creation of a Jewish state with the tale of “ethnic cleansing of Palestine that began more than sixty years ago”.
The Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation, headed by the son of Muammar al-Gaddafi. This fellow still insists that the Libyans convicted of the bombing of PanAm flight 103 were innocent.


The Obama administration has delayed a decision whether to come or go to this fiasco UNTIL the final hour. The opening sentence of this new draft still “reaffirms” the 2001 Durban Declaration which the US rejected the first time around for its overt discrimination and demonization of Israel. The administration has said it wouldn’t go to Durban II if this Declaration was “reaffirmed in toto.” Combined with the new allegations of racism against Israel, the President and UN Ambassador Rice have nowhere left to hide.

Other countries that might stay out, together with Canada and Israel, include Australia, Italy and the Netherlands. Australia has had a wet-finger in the wind for months. Italy is not participating at the moment and doesn’t have any reason to go back with this latest travesty. And Dutch efforts to improve the outcome document have been treated with disdain. Still the Germans and French are pressing hard for a show of EU solidarity – the merits of Durban II and all those faux-“red-lines” they once espoused be damned.

On Monday, April 20th, the anniversary of Hitler’s birth, an Iranian will be elected as a Vice-chair of a global “anti-racism” conference. In the afternoon of opening day, a genocidal Holocaust denier – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – will address a UN conference “against” racism. The European Union will sit and listen to an antisemite give a lecture about combating intolerance. And in the end most UN states will adopt a document incompatible with the UN’s foundational principle of the equality of all men and women and nations large and small.

A good day for UN-based antisemites. A bad day for those who care about human rights.

For a complete source of information on Durban II
see www.EYEontheUN.org/durban.


EYEontheUN monitors the UN direct from UN Headquarters in New York. EYEontheUN brings to light the real UN record on the key threats to democracy, human rights, and peace and security in our time. EYEontheUN provides a unique information base for the re-evaluation of priorities and directions for modern-day democratic societies.

Durban 2 (Durban Review Conference)

Welcome to my new blog. I am going to be attending the UN Durban Review Conference in Geneva from Sunday 19th April til the 24th. I will be posting daily blogs as to the progress of the conference and any interesting stories coming from the conference.

Most of you will not have a clue what the Durban 2 conference is, for your information i have pasted below a short overview taken from many sources as to what the conference is about.

You can also follow me at the conference on twitter. www.twitter.com/adamlangleben

Interesting Websites and sources:

http://www.ngo-monitor.org/

http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/Features/durban2.html

http://www.un.org/durbanreview2009/ - Official website of the UN

(From www.un.org)
Organized by the United Nations, the Durban Review Conference and the process of preparations leading up to it provide an opportunity to assess and accelerate progress on implementation of measures adopted at the 2001 World Conference against Racism, including assessment of contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

The 2001 World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance (WCAR), held in Durban, South Africa, was a landmark event in the struggle to improve the lives of millions of human beings around the world who are victims of racial discrimination and intolerance. After a wide-ranging debate, the Conference adopted by consensus the ground-breaking Durban Declaration and Programme of Action (DDPA), which provided an important new framework for guiding governments, non-governmental organizations and other institutions in their efforts to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

The DDPA is the most comprehensive and valuable framework that exists for addressing these extremely important issues. It encompasses far-reaching measures to combat racism in all its manifestations, including strengthening education, fighting poverty, securing development, improving the remedies and resources available to victims of racism, and bolstering respect for the rule of law and for human rights.

While progress has been made since 2001, there is a continued need for committed implementation of the DDPA. Racist attitudes and hate speech can be found in many countries and technologies such as the Internet provide new vehicles for their proliferation.

The decision to convene the Durban Review Conference was made by UN Member States at a General Assembly meeting in 2006 (Resolution A/RES/61/149). The General Assembly requested the UN Human Rights Council to prepare the process and the Human Rights Council therefore constituted a Preparatory Committee of the Conference. The work of the PrepCom is open to all UN Member States, beyond the 47 members of the Human Rights Council. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights was appointed by the UN Secretary-General to serve as Secretary-General of the Conference and her Office (OHCHR) functions as its Secretariat.


Objectives

In August 2007, the PrepCom set forth the following objectives for the Durban Review Conference:
  • To review progress and assess implementation of the DDPA by all stakeholders at the national, regional and international levels, including assessment of contemporary manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, through an inclusive, transparent and collaborative process, and identification of concrete measures and initiatives for combating and eliminating all manifestations of these phenomena;
  • To assess the effectiveness of the existing Durban follow-up mechanisms and other relevant UN mechanisms dealing with the issues of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance in order to enhance them;
  • To promote the universal ratification and implementation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and proper consideration of the recommendations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination;
  • To identify and share good practices achieved in the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

Members of the Preparatory Committee have repeatedly asserted that the Review Conference should be limited to a review of the implementation of the DDPA and should not re-open discussion on issues or introduce new issues.